Lower Carbon – Bigger Bucks!
‘In late 2009 Northamptonshire and “motorsport valley” scored a major lower carbon – bigger bucks triumph. The British Grand Prix is reputed to be worth some £54 million per year to the local economy; and in 2009, with the support of Northamptonshire County Council, a 17 year deal was signed between Silverstone and Formula One Management. It was recently stated that F1 drivers had travelled 53,248 air miles for the final five races of 2010; and that’s before they burn any fuel in their F1 cars. By keeping the grand prix at Silverstone and by discouraging Bernie Ecclestone from “exporting” yet another European grand prix to the other side of the world, we have actually saved the emission of millions of tonnes of carbon-dioxide, plus a wide range of other pollutants from the aircraft used by F1 race teams and spectators.
One single Boeing 747-400 carries 45,000 imperial gallons of kerosene; this quantity of jet fuel weighs around 163 metric tonnes and results in the emission of 522 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide. At 32,000 feet this has between two and four times the global warming impact of the same emission at sea level; say the equivalent of 1566 metric tonnes! However, the F1 “circus” doesn’t make only one flight, or use just one Boeing 747; and 40,000 spectators would require around one hundred B747 aircraft.
In June 2010, the FIA decided that F1 events should be rescheduled to reduce the use of air transport. So we can be thankful that the F1 aeronautical-environmental impact message, which originated in Northamptonshire, was so effectively used by DCMS and ministers of the previous government, to help save the British Grand Prix. However, this is just one step towards protecting the environment from plain stupid emissions.
The motorsport industry should also be driving the green automotive agenda fast forward. Cranfield University, Lotus, Ford and GM had all endorsed the concepts before January 2000. Then GM created the Opel Eco-Speedster in Germany, using Lotus aluminium platforms. This car achieved 155 mph and 113 mpg on the standard cycle in 2002; today Shell is promoting “FuelSave” while BP is investing in Canadian tar sands!
In 2003 it seemed that Patricia Hewitt, the Secretary of State at the DTI, had grasped the key messages. However, then we had the total façade of “Energy Efficient Motor Sport,” (EEMS) which commenced in 2003. They rushed off in all the wrong directions; and the programme was wound up in March 2009. Yet the resources for real British Racing Green formulae are still here; and there is much we can learn from aviation technology. There is greater efficiency to come out of diesel and spark ignition engines, particularly if you examine aero-engine history and the technologies which are currently banned by the motorsport regulators. The Ilmor “5-stroke” engine appears to be a prime candidate for eco-motorsport competitions; and there are a range of other efficient possibilities.
There are established links between cancers and the aromatics, which are added to gasolines. The health risks associated with synthetic lubricants have also become evident in aviation. In the USA, IndyCar racing uses transport grade ethanol; and improvements in air quality are high on the American racing agenda. Ethanol has proved to be an exceptional two-stroke fuel; take the poisons out of the fuel tank and you significantly reduce the poisons in the exhaust gases. Here Northamptonshire is in “pole position” and the Cougar Red ethanol powered two-stroke motorcycle, developed in Kettering, beat 34 Honda competition motorcycles at Donington Park in July 2009.
Motorsport today covers everything from karting to truck racing; yet there is no form of motorsport which actually drives fuel efficiency fast forward. We race “touring cars,” why aren’t we racing with eco-sports cars? We already have all of the “corner-stones and building blocks” within motorsport valley. Look at the expertise here in light-weight materials, light-weight power-trains, aerodynamics and various automotive technologies. However, you can’t play rugby using the rules of football; and you can’t have fuel efficient motorsport, using the archaic gas-guzzling regulations from a previous millennium.
The motorsport regulations “weren’t cut in stone by almighty God and given to Mosley to bring down the British Motorsport Mountain.” We should recall that at Silverstone in 2006, Max Mosley told us “saving fuel, saving energy is absolutely fundamental,” yet 1986 had been Energy Efficiency Year in Britain. We’ve recently reduced F1’s use of aviation fuel; we should now be aiming to drive forward real energy efficiency within two and four wheel motorsport. There is substantial funding available for the “green” automotive agenda; and companies in Northamptonshire should be in pole position.
David Cameron has recently stated that Britain must “create and innovate;” the Prime Minister has also been promoting the sciences. A creative, innovative and scientific approach has been applied to help save the British Grand Prix. When will we start to exploit the resources which are here, in a relevant, creative, innovative and scientific manner, to benefit the environment and to help with the arrival of peak oil and gas?
This unique performance engineering cluster described as Britain’s “motorsport valley” conveniently straddles the Oxford to Cambridge Arc. What better place to apply science, technology and engineering expertise to the “British Racing Green” automotive agenda?
There is much more which can be done to reduce fuel consumption in the automotive sector, while maintaining performance. However, many of the proven aero-technologies are currently banned across British motorsport. What is this doing for the creativity and innovation which the Prime Minister wants us to develop here in the UK? Some new efficient British Racing Green competitions for the 25th anniversary of Britain’s “Energy Efficiency Year” (1986) would seem none too soon for 2011. Why don’t we create the concept eco-sports car and eco-motorcycle in this county, as initial green steps forward?
If we get this right, there wouldn’t be a major vehicle manufacturer in the world which could afford to be outside this emerging “green” innovative motorsport engineering culture. New opportunities for inward investment would soon emerge. “He who does not move forward is backward.” This applies to the motorsport industry and to motorsport regulators, who determine the technological trajectory of this entire industry.’
Derek Lowe (Carbon!)
Blakesley Resident and Motorsport Enthusiast
Northamptonshire County Council is being presented with an international environmental award in recognition of best practice employed by its transport and highways department.
Have you ever wondered about the cost of all the technology we use today? I have to say until recently I hadn’t given it much thought. That was until I found out what our colleagues in IT have been up to.